In
1962 Rado presented the "Diastar", the world's first
scratch-resistant watch. The concept took a few years to gain popularity, but
when it has, it pushed other watchmakers to follow. Orient was one of the
brands that set out to deliver a scratch resistant watch. But before we dive
into this piece of history, let's first understand what scratch resistance is.
Hardness
– measured in HV (Vickers Hardness), inversely corresponds to the depth of a
scratch left by a pyramid-shaped indenter, when pressed at a given force
against the surface of the material. The deeper the dent, the lower the
hardness; the higher the HV value, the more scratch-resistant the material.
The
hardness of typical 316L stainless steel, as used on most watches is 150-200 HV
– depending on the specific compound and treatment. It generally contains iron,
chromium (16-18%), nickel (10-12%), and molybdenum (2-3%). Rolex's famed 904L
steel boasts similar hardness – it retains its shine thanks to better corrosion
resistance, not scratch-resistance.
HY-80
aka "submarine steel", used for instance by Sinn, achieves 300 HV
(Sinn actually further hardens it with surface treatment). Damasko manages to
reach 800 HV by a special treatment, removing nickel and adding carbon and
nitrogen.
It
is also possible to coat or harden just the surface of the steel, maintaining
the ability of the core of the material to sustain blows without breaking. Such
surface treatment can achieve well over 1000 HV, which is ceramic territory;
however, as this is skin deep, it would be a good protection against regular
scratches but leaves the metal vulnerables to deeper indentations.
Like
Rado with the Diastar, Orient used Tungsten Carbide for its "non-scratch"
watches. This material is extremely hard, measuring 2600 HV, and is generally
considered the hardest material that can be used in the jewelry and watchmaking
industry, excluding gemstones of course.
The
brand produced a few non-scratch watches in the late 1960s, mainly Deluxe and
Chronoace models. These typically cost significantly more than similar
stainless steel models, as much as doubling their price.
Many
Orient Nonscratch watches were characterized by a hexagonally-shaped caseback –
reminiscent of the hexagonal structure of Tungsten Carbide crystal. Ironically
the case-backs were made of steel.
Tungsten
Carbide had its limitations though: it is almost twice the density, and hence
the weight per given shape, than steel. It is more brittle than steel, which is
serious consideration: most people would rather have their watch get scratched
when hitting the door knob than break.
Tungsten
Carbide is also very hard to machine, and particularly tough to mold into
complex shapes. Which is why all of the Orient Non-Scratch watches you'll find
are either just a circular, lugless case or a similarly featureless and equally
lugless barrel.
Now,
there was nothing wrong with these case shapes, and many of these were
absolutely pretty, some with lovely "Mexican" or other colorful dials.
But, the cost and complexity of manufacturing them was considerable, and prevented
the use of more interesting case shapes, surface brushing, rotating bezels etc.
So,
like many other watchmakers, Orient ditched the carbide option in favor of
hardening stainless steel.
Orient's
"SSS" or Super-hard Stainless Steel claimed a surface hardness 1000
HV, a very respectable value in the 1970s. With this material, Orient could
produce more elaborate case shapes, and maintain similar machining to those
used with regular steel.
Super-hard
Stainless Steel was used initially with Chronoace watches, and later in the
1970s with some caliber 46-based models. Indeed the use of steel enabled Orient
to produce a greater variety of case designs with greater geometric complexity.
Another
advantage for the SSS approach was it enabled a more visually seamless
integration of the bracelet with the watch case. As carbides could not be used
to produce bracelets, the contrast between the relatively dull steel and the
bright sheen of the tungsten case might have seemed odd. That said – there's no
denying that even as new, SSS cases could not match the mirror-smooth polish of
the Nonscratch cases.
Towards
the 1980s, "SSS" models too gradually disappeared from Orient's
product lines. Today, even those Super-hard cases would show signs of aging;
however, vintage Orient Non-scratch watches can often be found with their
tungsten carbide cases sparkling like new.
Pictures that appear on this post were taken from old Orient catalogs, online sale ads, and Wikimedia.
Is it true that Orient reissued one of the non-scratch models of the 70s?
ReplyDeleteThere was a reissue of the chronoace with a similar design to the nonscratch, but as far as I know it was done in a standard stainless steel case
Delete