Orient Mako 40mm Hands-On Review

Orient's Mako family of diver-style watches is among the most important product lines in the brand's current and historical offerings. For almost 20 years, this group of models (starting with the old Mako and Ray watches with caliber 46, continuing with Mako II and Kamasu with cal. F6, and now "Mako III" range) has provided buyers with sports watches that are entry-level yet reliable, well made and respectable.

However wearable and popular Mako watches are at the current 42mm size, the demand for smaller watches has surged in recent years to a point where Orient obviously had to take note – and they did, in the form of the recently announced "Mako 40mm".

Here at the blog we also took note and wasted no time getting our hands on one of these babies, eager to see how worthy the newcomer is of wearing the Mako badge… so please say hello to Orient reference RA-AC0Q02L – blue dial, stainless steel, diver-design watch, aka Mako 40mm.

 

How It Looks

There is an undeniable appeal to all-steel designs. The new Mako proves this with the combination of steel case, bezel and bracelet – no plating, no bezel inserts, just using different finishing techniques to sculpt the metal. A bit of matte brushing here, a sparkle of smooth polish there, will get the job done if executed properly. And Orient definitely know how to make a good looking piece of metal for the price.

The dial looks practically black in low light, but reveals its blueness in the sunlight. The color is not entirely matte and not completely sunburst – rather, it is a mixture of both, a very pleasant combination often used by Orient.

One might argue that this reference represents the best of the new Mako: the blue dial works great with steel, and it's almost as versatile as the black dial version but with the added flash of color. The white dial version might come on as slightly more elegant. The purple and salmon dials can be good options if you already have a dark dial sports watch and looking for something a bit more playful, though their appeal might not be as long-lasting as this dark blue.

The dial layout is simple but well thought-out. All elements are nicely proportioned, and should work well even for the most nitpicking watch aficionados who like to complain about a hand being too short or a marker being out of place. It's just a nice looking dial.

Unlike Mako models, the smaller diameter here got Orient to ditch the old day-and-date combination in favor of just a date window. A very sensible choice, if you ask me, resulting in a cleaner looking dial.

Note the markers are somewhat reminiscent of the 1964 diver's first edition, as is the steel bezel; they all seem a little vintage-flavored. The hands are different from both the Mako's and vintage divers; they are squared-off and semi-skeletonized, and contribute to the clean look.

Overall finishing, however, is very much like the Mako 3 and Kamasu. You get very subtle circular finishing on the lug tops, and on the bezel, while the sides of the case are polished; likewise, the bracelet is brushed on top and polished on the sides. Also similar to the Mako are the two dolphins swimming on the case back.

Fans are expected to compare the new Mako with its older siblings and ask whether it retains the charm of the 42mm Mako. I would say, this new watch sure has a charm, but it is a different one. The smaller, more compact, all-steel case somehow reminds me of certain German tool watches (and yes, it also personally reminds me of my blue-dial world timer, in a good way).

It's not all flawless, though, and the new watch has a certain peculiar "bug" that appears on all dial versions, and can be seen even in the catalog pictures: the 26 minute marker is too close to 25, and the 33 minute marker is ever so slightly closer to 32 than to 34. Why is that? Is there an explanation? Is that a secret message to aliens, or is 2633 the year the world will end (Oh dear, I actually Googled and found this). It's one of those things you won't immediately notice, but once you have… you know. Hopefully Orient should get this fixed soon, rendering the early production batches collector's items…

 

How It Wears

Since size is supposedly the new Mako's highlight, let's first talk about dimensions. Indeed it is smaller than older models by roughly 2 millimeters – reducing case diameter from 41.8 to 39.9mm, to be precise.

However, the new model is only 0.3mm shorter than the larger versions, at 46.5mm lug to lug, vs 46.8mm. This means actual wearability is very similar to Mako 2/3 or Kamasu. That's not a bad thing, as these all work very well for most wrist sizes, hence their popularity. It's just that the new model has longer lugs, relative to its width, than the old Mako.

The new and old Mako even weigh about the same (165g, of the new model vs. the Mako 3/Kamasu's 169g) and are both 12.8mm thick, so the size difference has more to do with how the watch looks, than how it wears.

The bracelet is very similar to the old Mako's – except being 2mm narrower, as lug width here is 20mm. You get the same style of clasp, same hollow end-links, and while not being remotely luxurious Orient seem to stick to their successful formula here – offering good value for money with a bracelet that is simple but feels robust enough to match the tool-watch image.

All in all, the watch is very comfortable to wear, there's no hair pulling from the bracelet or pinching from the clasp, and it's got just enough heft to be felt but not be a burden on the wrist.

 

How It Functions

The beating heart of the Mako 40mm is Orient's caliber F6722, an automatic movement that is similar to the Mako 42's F6922 except for the omission of the day wheel. It features hand-winding and hacking, about 40 hours of power reserve, and the same stated accuracy of +25/-15 seconds per day. The watch reviewed provided a +11 seconds per day accuracy, with very little deviation between wearing and off-wrist time, which is quite acceptable for this price point and type of watch.

The relative weakness of the Kamasu I once reviewed was the crown, so it was interesting to see what has changed here.

Despite being a smaller watch, the crown is about the same size, though the crown-guard of the larger model makes it a little hard to make a direct comparison. The absence of a crown guard on the new Mako should have allowed for an easier grip on the crown, but somehow it does not feel this way, and operating the small crown is still tricky – particularly when trying to screw it into position.

Winding, however, does feel a little smoother compared to the Kamasu's rather gritty operation, and the crown is almost wobble-free, so there are also some improvements. All things considered, crown operation is still a relative weakness.

Bezel operation is on the hard side, harder than on the Kamasu – possibly because of the small diameter. But, it does offer accurate operation with almost no back-play, certainly better than most watches in this price range.

Legibility is excellent – the markers are big and clear, as are the hands, with sufficient lume to enable reading the time when it gets dark. It is not an all-night kind of crazy lume you might get from professional dive watches, but it is still pretty good. And while the sapphire crystal here does not feature the excellent anti-reflective coating found on most Orient Star models, the clarity and contrast of the dial layout make reading the time easy through most reflections.

Note that unlike most Orient diver watches (except the Kanno) there is no lume on the bezel, and the dot at 12 is just steel. As this is not intended as a true diver's watch, instead aiming for dive watch styling, this is not a major drawback, and if you see the bezel more as a decoration than a functional component it can actually be an advantage.

 

The Bottom Line

The new Mako 40 is not just a "smaller Mako". The difference in styling, and even more so in the wearing experience, is actually more noticeable than the difference in size. As such, it presents not just a compelling alternative to the 42mm model, but even a complementary option. This also makes it as strong a competitor in the entry-level automatic sports watch market as any of its Orient forerunners.

As a package, it's pretty convincing, in the functional-mechanical aspect as well as stylistically. Yes, it has its imperfections – the crown operation is still not fully satisfactory, and there's that weird minute-markers thing. But overall, you get a good looking watch that's as dependable, comfortable and well-made as we've come to expect from Orient. It really is enjoyable enough on the wrist to make one forget the downsides – most of the time.

Official pricing is about 5% above 42mm Mako/Kamasu models, and while the only reason that comes to mind is the steel bezel, it is a fairly minimal difference and street prices are now dropping to more realistic levels anyway; I'm seeing the Mako 40 now selling anywhere between 300-400 USD. It takes a while for a new watch to find its place on the supply/demand diagram, but I'm guessing it should soon glide toward the 300 mark, as older 42mm versions stay not to far below it.

So – well done Orient, get those minute markers fixed, and don't forget to give us a yellow-dial version next year, to celebrate the first Mako's 20^th anniversary!

  

The blog would like to thank Orient – Epson Europe for providing us this Mako 40mm for review.